The hard part is over. Hooray!
I’m so happy I could fly away on the back of a golden unicorn. Yes, there’s still another two exams papers to sit. And yes, there’s still an OSCE to do. But Principles of Medicine 4b is over; we even got good weather for it. And for that there are no words. However, some that might give you an idea: Jubilant. Ecstatic. Delighted. Exultant. Joyous. Etc.
So, what actually came up?
Anaesthetics
Not too much of this, unfortunately, but about representative of the number of lectures we got. Which was officially 5, but actually 4, because two of them were done together. The most interesting question, for 7 marks, was on the management of bleeding in a trauma patient. I was immediately reminded of jovial old army surgeon who spoke at UCL when I was there a couple of years ago.
“What do you do if someone’s bleeding?” he asked our trauma tutorial group.
“Give them fluids?” someone suggested.
“No, not that.”
“Take them to theater?” offered another. (Future surgeon I’d bet.)
“No, no. Before all that!”
“Apply pressure?” asked someone timidly.
“EXACTLY,” he boomed, “put your finger, your hand, both hands; however much it takes; on where the blood’s coming from and press hard.”
In addition to compression, I also said conservative fluid resuscitation, consider blood transfusion if it’s really not looking good, and take them to theater for definitive management.
There was a couple of questions on pain relief, spinal anaesthesia, mechanism of action, that sort of thing. The question that really did make me smile was on fluid replacement. One of the answers was colloids, but as you’ll know if you’ve been following the Dr Bower scandal, it might not be the answer for much longer.
Dermatology
Psoriasis. Not my strong point. One particularly nasty question EMQ gave three different patients with differing severities of disease and a list of possible treatments. We had to match the most appropriate treatment with the severity of the disease. Now, I’d learnt all the treatments for psoriasis, but pretty much by rote. I’ve no idea which comes first on the treatment ladder. Had a bit of fun with the guessing game.
ENT
Was remarkably gentle. Nothing horrible or rare, just common things are common. I did make a silly mistake and answered all the parts of one question as though the patient had polyps, but on re-reading, it became obvious that they didn’t have anything of the sort. Always worth checking your answers.
Forensics
No short answer questions for this, just a couple of matching questions on rape and decomposition. No one said it was a happy subject.
Genetics
Let’s not talk about that.
Geriatrics
Fluffy incontinence question. Hang on. Allow me to rephrase: a fluffy question on incontinence. Yes, that’s better. I gave fluffy answers, but it was something I actually remembered reading about so I’m confidant I got them right. The matching question with all the drug names? Not so much.
Haematology
It was always going to be haematological malignancies and the questions didn’t disappoint. I spent a lot of my time on the haem questions thinking ‘which one’s that again?’ as all the proliferative disorders have merged into one big blast cell mass in my brain. That does not sound healthy…
Infection
Soooooo many infection questions. Many on most appropriate antibiotics, which is definitely a weakness of mine. I guessed what sounded familiar when I was given options. When I wasn’t, they got Flucloxacillin. Simple as.
Immunology
For some reason I can’t remember the specifics of the immunology questions. Possibly that’s just as well, as I can’t look up the real answers and then feel bad because I got them all wrong. What I do remember vividly is giving just about every patient steroids. Cause steroids are good for whatever ails you. No question. They are. (Unless you have Cushing’s disease, in which case I will let you off with not taking them.)
Conspicuous only by it’s absence was breast disease, but I think we’ve decided they’re going to put that into Thursday’s exam under reproduction/gynae.
Overall, I’d say it’s difficult to judge how it went. The afternoon paper (matching questions) was definitely better, but I always prefer that style of questions. It’s weighted 40% of our mark, which isn’t bad considering it lasted half as long as the morning paper. I am 100% confidant I’ve passed, with probably a 14 or above, so it’s not going to take on the accolade of my worst ever mark. Beyond that I don’t know, but neither do I particularly care.
Beyond the exam, one other thing made me happy, and a little bit proud, today. I’m not sure if I’ve mentioned it before, but flash cards make up the back bone of my revision. Not the traditional question/answer format that people tend to use, but the ‘cram as much information as possible on an A6 sheet’ kind. I find it works very well for me. I make them up on the computer so the layout is neat and consistent. I’m picky about formatting at the best of times, and it only gets ten times worse when it comes to revision materials. Because I make them on the computer, it’s very easy to share them with people. This year I uploaded them to a file storage site and posted a link on Facebook. Several people said to me today that they really appreciated it and that they found them very useful. One person even said she owes me about 10 pints because they “saved her life”. I’m not going to lie, that made me feel pretty pleased with myself