Elephants’ wings

This is a bit long I know, and it wasn’t written by me, but I rather liked the story. It is a metaphor for religion. To be honest, it isn’t ground breaking or earth shattering or likely to cause any kind of tectonic activity at all, but I liked it as a short story more than as a metaphor, hence my reposting it here.

Once upon a time, four blind men were walking in the forest, and they bumped into an elephant.

Moe was in front, and found himself holding the trunk. “It has a tentacle,” he said. “I think we have found a giant squid!”

Larry bumped into the side of the elephant. “It’s a wall,” he said, “A big, bristly wall.”

Curly, at the back, touched the tail. “It’s nothing to worry about, nothing but a piece of rope dangling in the trail.”

Eagletosh saw the interruption as an opportunity to sit in the shade beneath a tree and relax. “It is my considered opinion,” he said, “that whatever it is has feathers. Beautiful iridescent feathers of many hues.”

The first three, being of a scientifical bent, quickly collaborated and changed places, and confirmed each other’s observations; they agreed that each had been correct in the results of their investigations, except that there wasn’t a hint of feathers anywhere about, but clearly their interpretations required correction and more data. So they explored further, reporting to each other what they were finding, in order to establish a more complete picture of the obstacle in the path.

“Tracing the tentacle back, I find that it is attached to a large head with eyes, fan-shaped ears, and a mouth bearing tusks. It is not a squid, alas, but seems to be a large mammal of some sort,” said Moe.

“Quite right, Moe — I have found four thick limbs. Definitely a large tetrapod,” said Larry.

Curly seems distressed. “It’s a bit complicated and delicate back here, guys, but I have probed an interesting orifice. Since this is a children’s story, I will defer on reporting the details.”

Eagletosh yawns and stretches in the shade of a tree. “It has wings, large wings, that it may ascend into the heavens and inspire humanity. There could be no purpose to such an animal without an ability to loft a metaphor and give us something to which we might aspire.”

The other three ignore the idling philosopher, because exciting things are happening with their elephant!

“I can feel its trunk grasping the vegetation, uprooting it, and stuffing it into its mouth! It’s prehensile! Amazing!”, said Moe.

Larry presses his ear against the animal’s flank. “I can hear rumbling noises as its digestive system processes the food! It’s very loud and large.”

There is a squishy plop from the back end. “Oh, no,” says Curly, “I can smell that, and I think I should go take a bath.”

“You are all completely missing the beauty of its unfurled wings,” sneers Eagletosh, “While you tinker with pedestrian trivialities and muck about in earthy debasement, I contemplate the transcendant qualities of this noble creature. ‘Tis an angel made manifest, a symbol of the deeper meaning of life.”

“No wings, knucklehead, and no feathers, either,” says Moe.

“Philistine,” says Eagletosh. “Perhaps they are invisible, or tucked inside clever hidden pockets on the flank of the elephant, or better yet, I suspect they are quantum. You can’t prove they aren’t quantum.”

The investigations continue, in meticulous detail by the three, and in ever broader strokes of metaphorical speculation by the one. Many years later, they have accomplished much.

Moe has studied the elephant and its behavior for years, figuring out how to communicate with it and other members of the herd, working out their diet, their diseases and health, and how to get them to work alongside people. He has profited, using elephants as heavy labor in construction work, and he has also used them, unfortunately, in war. He has not figured out how to use them as an air force, however…but he is a master of elephant biology and industry.

Larry studied the elephant, but has also used his knowledge of the animal to study the other beasts in the region: giraffes and hippos and lions and even people. He is an expert in comparative anatomy and physiology, and also has come up with an interesting theory to explain the similarities and differences between these animals. He is a famous scholar of the living world.

Curly’s experiences lead him to explore the environment of the elephant, from the dung beetles that scurry after them to the leafy branches they strip from the trees. He learns how the elephant is dependent on its surroundings, and how its actions change the forest and the plains. He becomes an ecologist and conservationist, and works to protect the herds and the other elements of the biome.

Eagletosh writes books. Very influential books. Soon, many of the people who have never encountered an elephant are convinced that they all have wings. Those who have seen photos are at least persuaded that elephants have quantum wings, which just happened to be vibrating invisibly when the picture was snapped. He convinces many people that the true virtue of the elephant lies in its splendid wings — to the point that anyone who disagrees and claims that they are only terrestrial animals is betraying the beauty of the elephant.

Exasperated, Larry takes a break from writing technical treatises about mammalian anatomy, and writes a book for the lay public, The Elephant Has No Wings. While quite popular, the Eagletoshians are outraged. How dare he denigrate the volant proboscidian? Does he think it a mere mechanical mammal, mired in mud, never soaring among the stars? Has he no appreciation for the scholarship of the experts in elephant wings? Doesn’t he realize that he can’t possibly disprove the existence of wings on elephants, especially when they can be tucked so neatly into the quantum? (The question of how the original prophets of wingedness came by their information never seems to come up, or is never considered very deeply.) It was offensive to cripple the poor elephants, rendering them earthbound.

When that book was quickly followed by Moe’s The Elephant Walks and Curly’s Land of the Elephant, the elephant wing scholars were in a panic — they were being attacked by experts in elephants, who seemed to know far more about elephants than they did! Fortunately, the scientists knew little about elephant’s wings — surprising, that — and the public was steeped in favorable certainty that elephants, far away, were flapping gallantly through the sky. They also had the benefit of vast sums of money. Wealth was rarely associated with competence in matters elephantine, and tycoons were pouring cash into efforts to reconcile the virtuous wingedness of elephants with the uncomfortable reality of anatomy. Even a few scientists who ought to know better were swayed over to the side of the winged; to their credit, it was rarely because of profit, but more because they were sentimentally attached to the idea of wings. They couldn’t deny the evidence, however, and were usually observed to squirm as they invoked the mystic power of the quantum, or of fleeting, invisible wings that only appeared when no one was looking.

And there the battle stands, an ongoing argument between the blind who struggle to explore the world as it is around them, and the blind who prefer to conjure phantoms in the spaces within their skulls. I have to disappoint you, because I have no ending and no resolution, only a question.

Where do you find meaning and joy and richness and beauty, O Reader? In elephants, or elephants’ wings?

© PZ Myers, 2009. All rights reserved.

Benedict XVI

You see, this is the problem I have with religion:

Pope tells Africa ‘condoms wrong’.
NHS Blog Doctor

And the original BBC article here.

This is why I can’t just pretend the whole thing doesn’t exist, because even though I don’t believe any of this stuff, some people do.

Welcome to the biggest preventable public health disaster in history. We have the knowledge, we have the means, what we lack is the common sense to see it through.

It makes my blood boil.

[Ed. Having now actually read the article, I can see the BBC have taken some liberties here, what the pontiff actually said was: "HIV/Aids is a tragedy that cannot be overcome through the distribution of condoms, which can even increase the problem". Ok, he didn't exactly say 'condoms wrong'. He was even correct in saying that the distribution of condoms cannot [solely] overcome the problem. You know, if he had stopped there I could have lived with it, but no, he had to ammend:which can even increase the problem”. And we all know what utter bollocks that is.]

1 day to go

or more accurately, 1hr 13mins.

I’m sitting downstairs in front of the fire. The TV is off; the room smells of the Christmas tree twinkling in the corner; the dog is lying on my feet; iTunes is playing soothing Christmas music. I guess one could say “all is quiet”, and indeed it is; Mum has just left for church.

You will notice that I am still here, however. It was not a decision I took lightly, which I know might surprise some of you. But when you think about it, who wants to be alone when the hour of midnight ticks over? No one, and certainly not by choice, surely?

I have been to church to sing every Christmas Eve I can remember. And that’s just it, that’s why we’ve always gone, to sing, not to worship. But we’re singing praises to God, which is a little contradictory. I can remember very clearly that I was sitting in the hairdressers in Alford last year, before school broke up for Christmas. I got the appointment time wrong, I was fifteen minutes early, so I had plenty of time to wait. Radio 2 was on in the back ground, Richard Dawkins was debating with the presenter about why it was okay for ‘non-believers’ to go to church on the 24th and sing carols. Can’t remember anything of what he said now, but I remember the moment very clearly. So should I have gone? Not becuase Dawkins said it was alright, I respect him but I don’t treat his word as (forgive me) gospel.

One of the main points, for me anyway, about being an atheist (agnostic if you want to get technical) is that I can do what I want to. Within reason of course, but there isn’t anyone or anything telling me how to live my life. And ironically I have to keep reminding myself of that when I make decisions about this sort of thing: do I go to church on Christmas Eve as I always have; do I take Gemma up on her offer of going to church one Sunday; just how many CU events can I attend. I need to remember that I can do these things if I want to, my atheism isn’t stopping me, I’m just going for different reasons. I’m going because I want to be with my mum when Christmas arrives; I’m going because I think it’s important that I understand Gemma’s belief; I can go to as many CU events as I bloody well want to!

It isn’t easy to have this belief system, which annoys me, because it should be the easiest thing in the world not to believe anything at all. I have to constantly be on my guard against turning to what has been branded evangelical atheism, or as George Orwell put it:

“He was an embittered atheist, the sort of atheist who does not so much disbelieve in God as personally dislike Him.”

I can do what ever the hell I want, and if that means going to church then I will, just because I can. So why then did I decide to stay here and not go with mum this evening. Well I wish I’d started writing this post about half an hour earlier, because it’s just struck me that I made the wrong choice.

Merry Christmas everyone.

Halloween

So I’m sitting here; right, dressed like a monk, of all things, waiting for a text from Mark to tell me what’s happening tonight.

About an hour ago I left my room to go to HubGrub, hoping I might just be able to get there without being seen by two particular people. Obviously, since the universe is conspiring against me, I run in to both those people in the space of about 5 minutes and 20 metres. Like I say, the universe likes to see me squirm.

Still, can’t complain, I brought this upon myself. At least the costume is reusable: ditch the cross and bible, instant Jedi…

To be honest, I’d probably have had more fun at the thing Cat invited me to, because going out isn’t exactly my idea of a fun night. Don’t think I’m going because I feel it’s my obligation to do so or anything convoluted like that, I’ll still enjoy it, I just think I could have enjoyed the evening more doing something else, especially when I would have been 100% safe from shepherding drunks home at 3 in the morning.

Ah well, it’s a sad day when the atheist in the monk outfit realises he’d have more fun spending the night with what essentially amounts to a room full of Christians than with his semi-secular friends. (Not to say the Christians aren’t my friends; I just meant……. oh forget it, you know what I mean.)

Aww Shit.

Soooo, where to begin? I won’t throw in the old “the beginning, a very good place to start” thing again, once a week is enough. I guess I should set the scene. Gemma and I just had (what I’m promised is the first of a great many) Religion talks…. Great. As you might have picked up on, if you know me that is, I’m ever so slightly pissed off. Now, I am genuinely only slightly pissed off, that wasn’t sarcasm, but I’m pissed off when I’ve absolutely no right to be, which makes me more pissed off because I’m not ‘allowing’ myself to feel annoyed….. isn’t the human mind such a brilliant thing, far too clever for it’s own good if you ask me.

*10 minute pause as Ross makes himself a sandwich*

Look, Gemma, if you’re ever reading this, I need you to know; I’m not really annoyed. We are all different people and accepting that is quite possibly the single most importance action of a citizen of a civilised society. I take a great deal of pride from the fact that I am an ‘agent of humanity’, whatever the hell that means, and I accept other people for who they are. You do make it rather difficult, however, because I know so much more of who you are, and you’re testing my capacity for understanding to the limits. This, of course, further annoys me, it is utterly ridiculous that what just occurred should stretch the limits of my tolerance. You were the perfect citizen, an exemplary agent of humanity. You made your points eloquently and unthreateningly. You listened to my counter-arguments and replied with some rather annoyingly good ones of your own, I liked the Celestial Teapot!

Perhaps it is this, then, that annoys me so. Is it the fact I know how intelligent and sensible you are, and you are forcing me to (once again) reassess my view of Christians. Except I don’t mean it like that. I don’t think all Christians (and Jews and Muslims and Sikhs etc etc) are not intelligent and sensible, and you haven’t been indoctrinated in to this way of thinking. You thought about it, you’re studying it, you’ve taken time to research it, trouble is I don’t believe any of your evidence.

Or maybe, and this could be it (because it leaves me coming out the other side of this blog post covered in the least possible amount of shit), it’s that you don’t seem to have any trouble accepting that I have a different view point. It’s getting easier for me since I met you (and truly, thank you for that) but I still have to make an effort to see your point of view. Maybe you do do the same as me and silently fume for a bit about how ridiculous it is, but I don’t see it, so I think you just carry on with your evening and I get all worked up about the whole thing. That doesn’t make me feel good, because it’s like I’m getting annoyed at you, which I’m not, and it’s questioning my belief in freedom of expression, and woe betide anyone who does that, even if it’s myself.

To anyone who’s actually still hanging around reading this far, I get that this doesn’t make a whole lot of sense right now, but I should be sleeping, not blogging. So I’m not even going to re-read any of this post, the inevitable typos can wait till tomorrow, I may even re-write this post to say what I’m actually trying to say, but I’ll leave the original up as a reminder to myself not to post about stuff this difficult to comprehend having had this little sleep…..

*dies*

[Ed. (at 11:10, 05/10/08) It seems, reading back over this post with the something like 9 hours sleep behind me, that it actually make a whole lot more sense than I thought. So, save from correcting those damn typos, I'm going to leave it as is, I haven't re-written any of it, it's still exactly as it was at 22:38 yesterday.]

[Ed. again (at 23:50, 06/10/08) Ok, so it seems I may have put my foot in it a little with that last post. Sorry. I know I've said it before, but I'm saying it publicly, and I'm going to keep saying it. Cause what I said was stupid and I feel like an idiot. Sorry.]

Some sort of Goo my brain has managed to squeeze out

Ok, so Friday night may have been boring, but things perked up a bit in the early hours of Saturday morning.

I’ve just got back from Gemma’s room (yes, I know what time it is thank you). It was a good night that, as usual, lasted far too long. Honestly, every time I leave I feel really guiltily about keeping her up so late and I promise myself I’ll leave earlier next time, but I never want to leave and she never kicks me out, so I end up staying just as late. Admittedly, tonight was ok since it’s Friday, but she wants to study tomorrow. I shall of course be doing the same, but I don’t seem to need quite so much sleep.

We set off to dinner sort of with the medic/floor buddies group, but mostly on our own. When we got to the Refectory she went to the loos and just as she was coming out Roy sidled up. Now Stephen usually joins us for tea, but we couldn’t find him, so I thought we were going to be alone for dinner. Obviously, it wasn’t meant to be. It’s not that I mind, sure, I can find Roy a bit ‘difficult’ at times, but we get on fine. I did however anticipate that we may be stuck with him for the rest of the night. Sure enough after dinner he came back with us to G’s room. We hung about until about 11 or 12, I can’t really remember, but that’s when I did a bad thing. I waited for Roy to mention bed, gave it a few minutes then quite firmly suggested it was time for us to go to bed. Gemma looked a bit disappointed that we were both leaving so soon, but I had a devious and despicable plan. I accompanied Roy to the doors of the Halls, said bye and made to go out the door, but as he walked away down the corridor I grabbed the door and held the latch from catching. After a few seconds I sneaked back inside, checked to see he was though the door and dashed back to Gemma’s room. I forgot to take a mental picture of her face when I reappeared, it may have been shock, it may have been curiosity, it may have been approval, either way, I feel bad about what I did. I mean… there’s no real way to say it any better, I ditched him.

We stayed up until about 3am just talking about stuff, and she gave me some lessons in her native tongue. We didn’t have ‘the talk’; because it really didn’t come up, plus it was far too late by the time we even started talking and I think we’d both like to be wide awake for it. Part of me is very happy about this, that part would rather that we never had that talk, that we maintained the happy status quo, but another part of me wants to have it more than anything, as Gemma herself put it “[it could destroy what we have but] it could also build on what we have would you like to take that leap to find out?” Well, like skydiving, the ancient part of my brain is saying “don’t you dare jump you fool”, where the younger, curious part of my brain is saying “yes, just jump, the unknown is the best place to explore”. So really, I don’t know what I want. I think if we do have it we should wait for the right moment to present itself, rather that ‘setting’ a time. I appreciated none of you have a clue what “the talk” is… well, it’s the religion talk. Why does she believe the world was created in 7 days (plus all the other things I have only a basic understanding of), it’s why I don’t believe any of it, and it’s also what exactly any of that actually means for us. Now by “us” I mean there’s her, and there’s me; not “us” as a ‘thing’. That’s another dilemma, one that can certainly wait till after ‘the talk’, but it’s one I had a dream about last night (by that I mean Thursday night). I can’t do justice to what was an excellent piece of dramatic art composed beautifully by my brain in a post at this time of the morning, so I’ll try and post about it tomorrow (today).

Religion, becuase I like to start with the small issues.

One of the most profound effects university has had on me has been my view of religion, let’s start at the beginning, a very good place to start:

I’m not actually quite sure what my parents believe; they just kind of ignored the whole religion thing I guess. We went to church on Christmas eve to sing the carols, but that was for the singing, not the religion. Certainly my mum never had a problem with my atheism, so long as I was tolerant of other belief systems, which I am, she wouldn’t really mind what I believed. As to my dad, well the less said about that the better, suffice it to say that he married a devout christian, and I think he just goes along with everything to keep her happy, as he does in most things. Still, he doesn’t go to church either; but I do despair sometimes… anyway the less said the better!

Anyway, on to the reason we’re here; how I think. Well, I went along with the whole religion thing just because I didn’t really see how it effected me. Then I went through the whole religion is evil thing, I read Dawkins, said a lot of stuff to people that I didn’t really have any business saying, and generally thought I knew a whole lot more than I actually did.

Then I came here, and I met some Christians. I met the yellow clad CU ones [Ed: Christian Union, a very big and powerful student society at my Uni who wear yellow T-Shirts. Seriously, when I first arrived I actually thought they were part of the Uni offical welcome team cause they were all over the place.], the liberal ones, and the one in particular that became my friend. I came to realise that actually I’d been deluding myself about my disapproval of religion almost as much as I had formally been about my belief in the whole thing. Sure, many of my basic feelings didn’t change, but the reasons I felt them sure as hell did. This post is long enough without me going in to detail about what exactly happened to change my mind (I know, you were all looking forward to it sooo much, another time then) but I will say I decided to get clued up.

I think (and after all since we can never have certain knowledge, I’m open to being corrected on this) I’m technically an agnostic, in that if God tapped me on the shoulder right now I might buck up my ideas, I’m a scientist after all, I can’t ignore evidence. However, I prefer the term atheist because it more exactly conveys to Joe-Bloggs-on-the-street what I think; God, in any form, doesn’t exist, no question about it. (Speaking to a certain religious someone, turns out God would never do that because he gave us free will so it would defeat the purpose of the whole thing if He took away the mystery. Cop out? I’ll let you decide.)

I’m also a metaphysical naturalist, in that I believe everything is a component of nature (naturalist bit) and that everything in nature is within the bounds of science to explain (metaphysical bit). Now, I’m perfectly confidant that there are things that science hasn’t found yet. I have personal experience of animals, horses particularly, knowing things they just couldn’t tell from the 5 traditional senses. Do I believe in telepathy, telekinesis and all that jazz? No, but there’s something, it’s quarks or the Higgs Boson or an as yet undiscovered or theorised about particle, but it’s there. Crucially, unlike Philosophical Naturalists, I believe this is part of nature and science can explain it, just hope I’m still around when they do.

Finally I’m a secular (you’d have never guessed would you?) humanist. I’m wary of humanism, and I’m not quite sure why. Yes, I believe in a “life stance that upholds human reason, ethics, and justice, and rejects supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and superstition” (Wikipedia) but something just doesn’t make me sure I want to go shouting from the rooftops that I’m a humanist just quite as much as I do about my atheism (agnosticism). We’ll see how that one pans out I suppose.

Beyond that I believe in tolerance, freedom of speech and chocolate chip cookies. Mmmmm…